right
i'm gonna have to re-watch black sheep. i developed my ideas very poorly in my notes. ther foundations are there, mostly to do with conflict between tradition and development, as well as land and identity, but as i said, poorly developed.
currently reading 'monster show' by david j. skal
its engagingly written though gets a bit confusing with all its jumping between details of production companies and the people involved with them. not very analytical either. but is serving the purpose of providing a lightly socio-contextual history of american horror films. insight into what has been considered horror and how this has changed as well as into industry reactions to horror films. tbh i'm not enjoying the industry focus, but its a really broad survey and that *is* helpful.
also 'antipodean tales' , a collection of supposedly gothic short fiction from new zealand. ive read about 8 of them so far and mostly seem to be more like, post-apocalyptic spiritualism. could be interesting if i was using stories (rather than films), but theyre not really very horror-y, nor are they gothic tbh. ha. not that i can quite define what i mean by gothic :S still its good for developing kind of, i guess, a 'feeling' of whats going on nationally in this area.
have a couple of general horror theory readers that ive started on. will review a couple of articles ive read tomorrow. but i need to re-view before i review (oh ha ha ha).
tonight: psycho, texas chainsaw massacre, friday 13th, nightmare on elm st., dawn of the dead and carrie
these are for my own benefit, familiarising myself with more of the genre, so i wont be writing individual reviews but i may have a rant...you know, for practice ^^
also, uni should give me a book allowance. how on earth was i to know id actually wnat to spend my course related costs on course related items eh? ffs.